Brentham v. Gentlemen of West London
Monday
30 August 2010, Brentham CC, London
W5. Toss agreed. Sunny, 21C
Drawn
The Gents produced
one of their performances of the season (writes Ken Toft) to emerge with a
deserved draw against a strong Brentham XI at their excellent Ealing ground in
an incident packed game. Much credit goes to Andy Burman who was able to secure
this prestigious fixture through one of his many cricketing contacts.
Having had his
fingers burnt in the Old Tenisonians game, captain Gilkes opted for a timed
game in preference to the other option on offer of 40 overs per side. An agreed
‘toss’ resulted in the home team having first use of a perfect batting wicket,
although the outfield was fairly lush from the midweek rain which made the long
straight boundary at the far end a difficult prospect for all but the most
powerful hitters. Brentham, containing 4 first XI players, were keen to give some of their youngsters an
opportunity up the order and almost to a man they were able to skilfully accumulate
runs, giving the Gents arguably their hardest fielding test of the season. To
their credit the Gents stuck to their task admirably, with decent spells from
Druv (3-52), Sumit (2-46) and Sanjay plus the usual athletic fielding from
Newcombe.
As often happens
when the Gents lock horns with stronger teams, the extra effort required
resulted in injuries and this was almost reminiscent of the ‘Retreat from
Moscow’ game at Bedouins a few seasons ago. Caveney became the first casualty when an attempted
tumbling stop resulted in a nasty dislocated finger, the sight of which caused
many team mates and opponents to move hastily in the opposite direction. Mr
Burman stoically conquered his dislike of hospitals to drive Wayne to the local A. and E. and he returned patched
up and smiling again during the tea break. Injuries in subsequent seasons are
unlikely to have such a swift and efficient resolution after the ravages of the
appalling ConDem government have kicked in.
Guest Steve Bignell was next to limp off with a hamstring injury after
tripping on the sloping outfield, reducing the Gents to 10 men. No doubt his
West XI team mates will exhibit due sympathy.
Perhaps it was
therefore understandable that the Gents began to wilt as the innings wore on
and Brentham declared on an impressive 240-6 from 38 overs. After an excellent
tea, during which Masterchef Hemin Patel criticised the mixing of cheese with
tuna, the Gents commenced their reply reasonably well with both Gilkes and Druv
finding the boundary when given the opportunity by generally tight bowling,
Budden impressing with his pace and accuracy off a short run up. After losing
both openers and Kumar, the impressive Hamid Khan (7 x 4s) and Newcombe put on
a fine 56 partnership which steadied the innings. Hamid’s mixture of stout
defence and elegant drives when given the opportunity was exactly the approach
required and showed maturity way beyond his years. Greg’s marathon 68 ball
innings drew some negative comment as well as synchronised arm waving
impersonations of the captains bowling from the fielders, but he was unlucky
that many shots went to fielders and without his adhesive qualities the Gents
would have lost the game. However there was still much work to be done when
Sanjay came to the crease at number 6 and in typical fashion he counter
attacked to great effect for a fine unbeaten half century (10 x 4s), ably
supported by another talented product of
the prolific Khan line, Waleed.
As the light
began to close in, Budden (5-33) returned and made important breakthroughs
before I was controversially dismissed in the penultimate over. On being well
beaten by a good delivery, a single outfielder appealed and the rather
truculent elderly umpire, who had previously been disinclined to raise his
finger, bizarrely upheld it. The consensus amongst the close fielders was that
I hadn’t made contact and a withdrawal of the appeal was briefly discussed but
somehow never happened, league players probably having no time for such
niceties. Fortunately Sanjay batted out the final over to secure the draw and
it had no bearing on the outcome. Later, to add insult to injury, as treasurer
I paid the umpiring fee although what we were charged for the day was great
value for money given the excellent standard of the venue.
The final Gents
total of 170-8 was the clubs highest batting second in a draw and only their 7th
draw in total. It was certainly well earned as 46 overs were bowled after tea,
a credit to Brentham’s over rate as well as the Gents batting resolve which has
been absent for large parts of the season. Thanks are due to Phil Hill, who
along with Steve and the Khan’s helped us put out a full team.
|
Brentham
|
Gentlemen of West London
|
|
Saggers
|
|
b Kumar
|
40
|
D Patel
|
c Saggers
|
b Budden
|
12
|
|
Mansi
|
c S Patel
|
b Hill
|
36
|
*Gilkes
|
|
b Budden
|
9
|
|
E Brett
|
|
b Kumar
|
14
|
Newcombe
|
|
b E Brett
|
9
|
|
R Pettifer
|
|
b D Patel
|
0
|
Kumar
|
|
b Budden
|
6
|
|
Patel
|
c H Patel
|
b D Patel
|
42
|
†H Khan
|
st Prabhu
|
b Saggers
|
47
|
|
†Prabhu
|
c W Khan
|
b D Patel
|
26
|
S
Patel
|
not out
|
|
54
|
|
C Brett
|
|
|
33
|
†W Khan
|
c and
|
b Budden
|
18
|
|
†Hamidon
|
|
|
32
|
H Patel
|
|
b Budden
|
0
|
|
Budden
|
did not bat
|
|
|
Toft
|
c Hamidon
|
b Mansi
|
0
|
|
Brandreth
|
did not bat
|
|
|
Hill
|
not out
|
|
0
|
|
*J Pettifer
|
did not bat
|
|
|
Caveney
|
did not bat
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bignell
|
did not bat
|
|
|
|
Extras
|
|
1nb 8w 6b 2lb
|
17
|
Extras
|
|
1nb 9w 4b 1lb
|
15
|
|
Total
|
39 overs
|
6 wickets
|
240
|
Total
|
46 overs
|
8 wickets
|
170
|
|
FoW: 71, 94, 99, 103, 158, 177
|
FoW: 21, 36, 42, 98, 104, 155, 165, 170
|
|
Bowler
|
|
|
|
Bowler
|
|
|
|
|
S
Patel
|
7-0-27-0
|
|
|
Patel
|
4-1-14-0
|
|
|
|
W Khan
|
5-0-38-0
|
|
|
Budden
|
13-5-33-5
|
|
|
|
Kumar
|
8-1-46-2
|
|
|
Brandreth
|
6-3-19-0
|
|
|
|
D Patel
|
11-1-52-3
|
|
|
R Pettifer
|
5-1-15-0
|
|
|
|
Hill
|
4-0-23-1
|
|
|
J Pettifer
|
7-1-30-0
|
|
|
|
H Patel
|
3-0-22-0
|
|
|
Saggers
|
3-1-16-1
|
|
|
|
Newcombe
|
1-0-22-0
|
|
|
E Brett
|
4-1-15-1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C Brett
|
2-0-17-0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mansi
|
2-0-10-1
|
|
|