THE GENT
Tales
from the corridor of uncertainty
Thankful for small mercies…

Gent batsman celebrates his maiden ten
INSIDE…
- Season’s
review
- Match
reports
West XI (Bob Ashton Memorial Cup) (lost by 8 wickets)
Salix (lost by 3 wickets)
- Selectors
announce ICC World XI to play Gents
- Letters
– Snarler, Neil Hadfield
and Brian Susman (Bedouins)
- 2005
Honours Board
- Final
averages
Contact the magazine that noticed Sergeant Wilson batting right-handed
and bowling left-handed in “The Test” via e-mail andrewburman_840@hotmail.com
or mobile 07802-788424
Read about The Gents on www.gowlcc.org.uk
2005
GWLCC AGM
Waggon
and Horses, 1 Surbiton Hill Road,
Surbiton 6.30pm
Saturday 12 November
Some gems amid a
year of transition
Not even the most ardent Gent fan
could call 2005 a campaign of unremitting success, but it did have its moments.
The PALs League was retained on a shared basis after
two compelling early performances meant that The Gents could not be overhauled,
West XI were taken to a decider in the Bob Ashton Memorial Cup for the first
time since 2002 and there was a club record total of 264/6 against London Rams,
who replied with the only 200 plus score conceded by The Gents all year. That
game saw Sanjay Patel’s maiden hundred, which came just 22 days after Nabil Husain’s, one of an
unprecedented six scores of 50 plus in just 13 games for the young Pakistani
who dominated the batting with 586 runs, an aggregate exceeded only by Jim
Wright’s 715 in 2000. Otherwise, the batting was patchy, with only Sanjay (303)
and Peter Denton (207) past 200, though Denton
(who along with Paul Turpin kept wicket manfully and skilfully) and guest Neepam Bhatt recorded their maiden fifties, the former
after a recount due to botched scoring (Husain’s
hundred was similarly upgraded after proper audit). Mark Sciberras
came close to his maiden fifty twice. A notable career milestone was Sanjay
Patel’s achievement of 3,000 runs and 200 wickets, his 200th. wicket being the redoubtable Mr. K. Dimond.
The absence of a strike bowler for all bar two games was felt, though Husain, Sanjay Patel, Sciberras (top of the wickets list with 18) and Jim Wright were economical and sometimes penetrative. Stuart Snelling took The Gents’ only four-wicket haul (Dhruv Patel’s bizarre 4-57 came when on loan to Sunderland SC). Tony Buck, Graham Butt, Dhruv, Hemin and Ketan Patel were less consistent, going for five plus an
over, though each had at least one excellent spell. Tony Buck and Hemin Patel (7 each) took most catches in a year of outcricket that was patchy but, as at
Gunnersbury
Park, occasionally inspired.
In the high summer, The Gents were often very good indeed,
but the only early season success came in the 1-run nailbiter
against Pak, impressively achieved without the Captain. An unbeaten club record
fourth-wicket stand of 127 between Husain and Sanjay
Patel at Berrylands kick-started an impressive run of
scores, the only blips being New Barbarian Weasels at home and West XI away,
the latter game actually won, by tight bowling (led by Mr. Snelling
on a brief return from Brazil) and fielding. True, The Gents were unable to
defend 180-plus scores in the second Pak game and at Brondesbury
Casuals but the run gluts in both games had an epic quality and several players
thought the latter (agonisingly lost by 3 wickets off the fifth ball of the
final possible over in a 40 over game) the best of the year. It was certainly
up there with the first Pak and second West X encounters.
But to offset these spectaculars, there were dismal
collapses against the ever-sociable London Saints (twice), Jay Bharat, New Barbarian Weasels, Salix and, statistically at
least, the worst of the lot, 60 all out at home to West XI. It was common in
the post mortems to plead for more settled batting orders, but that is easier
said than done when several top batters are only able to play half the games.
It was at first hard to adjust to the absence of Ryon Derriman, Bill Flack, Stuart
Snelling and Wayne Thompson, but as the Captain
rightly said there was nothing wrong with the teams The Gents did field, it was
just that several players did not do themselves justice. Indeed, proven matchwinners Tony Buck, Richard Gilkes,
Justin Norcott, Dhruv
Patel, Ken Toft and Jim Wright had quiet seasons by their own august standards.
In any case, new arrivals do not want to hear about how superior their
predecessors supposedly were. There was ebb and flow in the squad, a fact of
cricketing life at every level, and new players Graham Butt, Hemin Patel, Paul Turpin and eternal standby Ketan Patel fitted in and played well. A total of 34
players was used, two up on 2004 but 14 down on the mix and match 2003
campaign. Full sides were fielded every week, impressive as the virile Messrs. Gilkes, Patel (S), Turpin and Wright had new anklebiter commitments to juggle.
It is difficult to pitch exactly where The Gents are in the
evolutionary cycle. Stuart Snelling will be returning
to England in
2006 and he will make a big difference not only with his bowling but his
personality and demeanour. It is also to be hoped that Bill Flack’s health will
allow him to play more games. In Sanjay Patel and Tony Buck, both of whom are
standing again for the Captaincy and Vice Captaincy, the club has first class
leaders and there are enough talented players in the squad to improve on 2005’s
7/12 win/loss account significantly.
The club must address the question of its home venue. Only
one game could be played at Old Tenisonians CC due to
rain, while Victoria RG was capricious and at times dangerous. Though one objectionist referred to “a lot of unhappy members” after
the admittedly difficult Salix game, and there were the usual barbs from a
tightly-knit group of politically motivated men in another place, the spirit
was positive and Chairman Gilkes organised several
sociable trips to the Oval. Finally, the club website has attracted very positive
comment. The photos are a superb innovation and the message board served its
purpose as a debating forum, at least once Bill Flack briskly reported that
interloping marketing company to the FBI. It was the innovation of the year.
2005 Honours Board – a
batsman’s summer
|
Batting
104* Nabil Husain v New Barbarian
Weasels 11 June
100* Sanjay Patel
v. London
Rams 3 July
87* Courtney
Perry for New Barbarian Weasels 9 July
89* Steve Begley
for St. Anne’s Allstars 24 April
81* Shahid
Mahmood for Pak 19 June
79* Scott Kirk
for Urban Associates 22 May
79 Nabil Husain v.
Sunderland
SC
30 July
70 Rizvan Saiid for Brondesbury Casuals 26 June
66 Toby Cresswell for Brondesbury
Casuals 26 June
61 Nabil Husain v. Pak 19 June
58 Courtney
Perry for New Barb’rian Weasels 11 June
57* Allan Davies
for London
Rams 3 July
57 Luke Satchell for London
Owls 4 September
56 Rakesh Naik for Jay Bharat 21 August
54 Nabil
Husain v. 12 Angry Men 8 May
53* Neale
Anderson for 12 Angry Men 8 May
53 Nabil Husain v.
London
Rams 3 July
|
Batting (continued)
51 Mike Severn
for London
Rams 3 July
51 Neepam Bhatt v. London
Rams 3 July
51 Nabil Husain v. West XI 16 July
51 Trevor Mayhew
for London
Saints 14 August
50 Peter
Denton
v. London
Owls 4 September
Bowling
5-27 Pete Berkeley for London Saints 5 June
4-10 Richard Parker for Enterprise 7 August
4-12 Ronesh
for Jay Bharat 21 August
4-12 Stuart Lumsden
for Salix 18 September
4-17 Chris Wright for West XI 16 July
4-13 James Devlin for St. Anne’s Allstars
24 April
4-25 Chris Dane for West XI 11
September
4-57 Dhruv
Patel for Sunderland SC 30 July
|
Meltdown in
Greenford
Two tough away trips at season’s end proved a bridge too far
for The Gents. A quirk of the BAMC is that West XI have
two home games out of three, though if three were played at Surbiton it would
probably be 0-3 every year. Whatever, The Gents did not give
of their best in the blustery 2005 finale and were comfortably beaten as the
hosts completed their finest ever season. Their tally of 18 wins from 23
matches equals that of 1992, when 25 fixtures were played, so the percentage of
victories in 2005 was the best in the history of the club. They had previously
won the Lord Nelson Cup (a shame the powerful Urban Associates were banned) so
may be said to have completed a cup and cup double. The epicentre of much
recent bother, Mr. A. Robinson (whose hot air emissions have done so much to
accelerate global warming), was very sweet and well behaved.
Season 18 ended in Greenford with The Gents playing Kwik Cricket, as copyrighted in the Blunder Years and honed
in 2005 at points of the compass from Battersea in the South to Berkhamsted in the North. The game was lost but of more
significance was the apocalyptic meltdown of the club’s administration, an
aspect of which it has been rightly proud over the years, whatever has gone on on the pitch. After the game, Secretary Andrew Burman was
heard to say that he would “rather be convulsed with bird flu than go through
that again.” The problems started when 12 Gents pitched up, the constitution of
the team being uncertain even on the Sunday morning. That is by no means a
rarity (though perhaps it should be) but usually an accommodation can be sought
with the opposition, but since it then transpired that The Gents had no kit
(left in Berkhamsted as the club had a Will Hay
moment) and could not even supply a pair of match balls, Captain Sanjay rightly
deemed it impolitic to grovel for a 12-a-side game with the Salix skipper. The
result was that poor Justin Norcott had his afternoon
wasted. He took it well but the Secretary would like to repeat the private
apology offered to Justin. It is hoped that the several pints of bitter beer
with which the apology was reinforced made partial amends.
Neil Hadfield
(12 Angry Men) writes…
Last week I sent a
cheque for £500 to Macmillan Cancer Relief on behalf of The Twelve Angry Men
Cricket Club and Friends, in memory of Miles Whitehead.
Paul Stein on behalf of MCR replied with the following:
“On behalf of Macmillan Cancer
Relief, thank you for raising the fantastic total of £500 in memory of Miles
Whitehead. Please accept our deepest condolences at your loss and kindly pass
on our thanks and best wishes to
the
other members of the cricket club. Your support will enable us to continue our
vital work, providing expert
care
and emotional support that makes a real difference to patients and their
families affected by cancer. Many thanks again for all your efforts, which will
change the lives of people living with cancer today.”
He
also mentions the funding of a specialist clinical nurse at the Lynda Jackson
Macmillan Centre where Miles was cared for. I also sent a cheque for
£1,620 direct to the LJMC and I will let you know their reply when I receive
it. Would any of you who know of people who donated kindly
forward this message to them. Thanks.
The bowler from Ipanema writes…
I am sorry to be missing this year’s A.G.M. I have kept in
touch with Gents’ current affairs mostly by email and via the Queen’s Internet
so I only have a few comments to offer.
Venue: After years supporting the use of Victoria RG
as a home ground, I think we have to accept that it is just not up to scratch
anymore. Short of somehow persuading Kingston
BC
to dig the pitch up and starting again (and even then, the quality of such work
would almost certainly be questionable), I think we have little choice but to
re-consider moving at least half of our home fixtures to a new venue. Of course
cost will be a major consideration but the standard of cricket that we play
against teams such as the West XI, Saints, Pak, Weasels, etc. demands a higher
standard of wicket. I would support a higher annual membership fee to fund this
but I appreciate that this might not be affordable to all. Perhaps those of us
who are fortunate enough not to have financial worries might volunteer to pay a
higher fee?
Kit: I find it disgraceful that the kit was left at Berkhamsted. Yet again, the issue of who looks after the
kit is not addressed properly and it is left to two or three players the whole
season. The general attitude of the membership towards the kit is just not good
enough. I would suggest strongly that a kit rota is devised each week when the
team is announced. In other words, each week we identify one or two players who
have cars and who are playing the following week to be responsible for taking
the kit home and bringing it the following week. I appreciate this is not
viable for those who come by train, bus or taxi to matches.
If the person nominated on the kit rota cannot then fulfil
his duties for whatever reason, that person must take individual responsibility
for finding a substitute. In this age of mobile phones and email, I cannot
imagine that this would be too difficult. I would go as far as having a kit
inventory at the start of each new season which is checked on two occasions
during the season. Perhaps we should appoint a Kit Manager at the A.G.M.?
Website: Scibo should be commended for
this excellent piece of work, which is highly professional and beats all oppo websites hands down. In light of my comments on the
kit, may I suggest that the mobile phone numbers and email addresses of the
membership are published on the website to facilitate better intra-team
communications?
Controversy reigns as ICC picks its team
Desperate to regain credibility after the less than bothered
performances by its World XI in Australia in October (how much greater
commitment was shown by the 1970 RoW side who visited
England, though they did have a full tour to acclimatise),
the ICC has picked its team to play The Gents in a one-off six day Test at
Victoria RG, Surbiton in April 2006. Only one player
per Gent oppo is allowed, so controversially there
are no places for Bhavesh Vyas,
Chrisses Dane and Wright or Pak’s Shahid
Mahmood, who scored an untroubled 81 not out against
The Gents in July and could probably still be batting. Instead
his blistering all-rounder team-mate Fawad makes the
cut on the strength of his awesome ton v. NBWCC. Performances against
The Gents games were a significant factor, so Wayne Thompson, who did not play
for London Rams in July, could not be considered. The team bats deep but
perhaps lacks a bit of searing pace though with the spinners expected to do the
bulk of the work this is not seen as a problem.
|
ICC skipper Scott Kirk said “It should be a good
contest. We’ll be looking to win the toss and based on the 2005 performances
by these lads against The Gents rack up 750 to 800 by tea on the second day,
declare and get amongst them. The slow left-armers
of Laing and Ronesh could
have a big part to play, as traditionally the wickets at Surbiton
crumble a bit after the first over or so.”
Gent skipper Sanjay Patel is relishing the challenge.
“Buck can captain this one,” he said, “it will be good experience for him.
We’ll be looking to bat for at least 25 overs and
put them under pressure then it’ll be up to Dhruv, Ketan and Hemin to tweak us to
a win.”
|
ICC Recreational XII April
2006
Trevor Mayhew (London Saints)
Courtney Perry (New Barbarian
Weasels)
*Scott Kirk (Urban Associates)
Rizvan Saiid (Brondesbury
Casuals)
Luke Satchell
(London Owls)
†Damon Wilson (12 Angry Men)
Fawad (Pak)
Allan Davies (London Rams)
Ronesh (Jay Bharat)
James Devlin (St. Anne’s Allstars)
Dave Laing
(West XI)
Richard Parker (Enterprise) (12th. man)
|
Game 18: Berkhamsted
CC, Sunday, 11 September. West XI won toss. Misty and showery, 17°
Beggars
swoop in the mist
In sepulchral light, mist and rain The Gents played to below
their potential in the deciding Bob Ashton Memorial Cup match. That might be
enough to beat some teams on the circuit but certainly not this focused,
talented Beggar outfit who romped to a deserved win with overs
and wickets galore to spare. Though a disappointment to players and supporters,
however, it is difficult to write a harsh match report. Atrocious conditions
obtained, but they were the same for both sides and this was a grand occasion,
greatly enlivened by the warm hospitality of the host club and the humour of
Dave Laing, who, in the absence of Mr. Bender, held
his hands up, manfully supplying quips and wisecracks. So, for the third
successive year, the noble old trophy goes to West XI, equalling their
1990-1992 record, though still a few Gent batting collapses short of The Gents’
golden summers of 1993-1997.
The simple facts of the game are that once again, The Gents’
batsmen failed to build on a promising start or, perhaps more pertinently, were
not allowed to. The Beggar all-seam attack was remorseless, though all credit
to Jim and HP, who laid good foundations before the burly stumper
holed out to square-leg Blackmore in Dane’s wild
first over. Scibo edged to a juggling Hill at slip
off Wright, who soon had his namesake caught behind by Robinson. Husain, Dhruv and the fawn bejacketed Sanjay shone all too briefly, though there were
some sublime shots in this period of play, Dhruv
lofting Wright for a straight sixer, the only one of
the innings, before slicing to Walton at point. At 83/4 with 11 overs left, and Husain and the
skip at the crease, the foundations were there for a competitive if, truth be
told, probably not match-winning 150 total, but West
XI had other ideas, Bhatt bowling the both of them.
Dane then came back and the innings went into quick
freefall. Buck did his best to shepherd the tail, but Justin fell bowled,
Turpin caught and bowled, Hemin daftly run out by
Taylor having been called to the danger end before Buck himself propped up
another c&b to Dane, six wickets gone in 38 balls
and only 33 added. It was bitterly disappointing but soon players and fans were
tucking into tea in the warm clubhouse and hooray for that.
In July The Gents had the edge in catching – now the roles
were to be reversed. West XI put their best five all-rounders
one to five in the order, with the result that four chaps neither batted nor
bowled, though like invisible sitcom characters such as Miss Cathcart and
Elizabeth Mainwaring, several were vital for plot development. This tough
stance paid handsome dividends, hard though The Gents fought in the ninety
brief minutes of the innings. Vyas was dropped
several times before the game Hemin clung on at point
but after that not one of six chances was taken, though all bar one was a
toughie. Wright and Taylor went for their shots and limited what Sanjay could
so tactically. He was further handicapped by Dhruv’s
inability to grip the new ball (one was agreed per innings) and Husain’s inability to keep his feet. Be it here recorded
that there were top spells for the skipper and Scibo,
though runs came freely at the other end throughout. A margin of nine wickets
would have been harsh so it is a pleasure to be able to record Graham Butt’s
first wicket in this series – a pearler to see off
Wright – though Taylor soon won the
game, assisted by plentiful extras. Grim viewing for Gent
fans it undoubtedly was, but at least the end came quickly as the rain
intensified. Well played West XI. The Gents will be back.
So many times have these old rivals crossed bats that there
are no original plots left. This game was a repeat of the deciding leg in 1990,
the first year of the BAMC and fought for the original trophy, scandalously
lost by then Beggar captain Charles Arthur some years after. The two sides
pitched up in gale and rain at Warren Farm and West XI won by nine wickets.
Gents; †Denton 13, Wright 34, Sciberras 0, Husain 18, D Patel
16, *S Patel 8, Buck 9, Norcott 0, Turpin 2, H Patel
0, Butt 0 not out, Extras 16, 116
all out (30.2 overs)
FoW; 43, 51, 57, 83, 101, 106, 108, 110, 114, 116
Bowling;
Taylor 0-17, Hill 0-20, Wright 3-19, Dane 4-25, Bhatt 2-27
Catches; Dane 2, Blackmore 1, Hill 1, Robinson 1, Walton 1
West XI (won toss); Vyas
20, Taylor 41 not out, *Wright 37, Dane 0 not out, N Bhatt, S Rennie, P Walton, G Blackmore, †A
Robinson, P Hill and D Laing dnb,
Extras 20, 117 for 2 (23.2 overs)
FoW; 30, 106
Bowling; S Patel 1-19, D
Patel 0-16, Sciberras 0-15, Husain
0-14, Wright 0-9, Buck 0-17, Butt 1-16
Catches; H Patel 1
Lost by 8 wickets
Game 19: GSK Sports Club,
Greenford, Sunday, 18 September. Salix won toss. Cloudy, 16°
Gloom
in Greenford as season ends on downbeat note
The Gents fought hard in the field but were unable to end
the topsy-turvy 2005 season with a win in a game that was typical of much of
the campaign. Once more they failed to bat 35 overs
(on a good pitch), 46 balls remaining unbowled when Jacobs
bowled Paul Turpin and once more they fell a good
measure short of a par score. Salix tinkered with their batting order and good
Gents bowling made steady inroads before the powerful Rayner
steered the hosts home with plenty of overs in hand.
The match stared a little late but before the first over was
bowled Sanjay assembled all of his troops bar Buck for a pep talk. To this
writer, his comments about the bulk of the teams’s
commitment at Berkhamsted were unfair but he called
it as he saw it. Job done, Buck was bowled ball four. Gilkes
and Wright hit five good boundaries before the chairman picked out square-leg.
Wright then holed out off the fourth ball bowled by the slow left-armer Ellis and when Dhruv copped
an lbw off a low full-toss The Gents were in the mire at 30/4. The pacy, slingy Lumsden
enabled Denton to record the second
of four ducks with one of the few balls that misbehaved all day, the cherry
going under the bat and cannoning low into the stumps.
The counterattacking Sciberras/Sanjay
Patel stand at least saved the innings from unmitigated disaster. It only
lasted half an hour but it gave the visitors a glimmer of hope, hope that was
dashed when Sciberras fell, also bowled Lumsden. A rare duck from Toft meant that Gents had lost
seven wickets in 20 overs. Things were looking dicey.
Not for the first time, Hill batted well with the skipper,
whose valiant 32 (five fours) at least saw him to 300 runs for the season
before Rayner took his third catch at long-on of the
innings off the spin of Chaganti, who soon bowled
Hill. A few minutes later and it was all up at 93 all
out.
As tea had been ordered for precisely a quarter to four (the
expectation being that a side could bat its overs)
and it was now only two minutes to three, Salix’s Dr. Fletcher, announced that
play “will recommence in eight minutes.” Sitting in the GSK media centre, Your
Correspondent noted that the mid-innings break was actually twelve
minutes. Not on.
In the ten overs pre-tea, Gents
did rather well, the skipper trapping Dyson fifth ball and Hill bowling Henig with the seventh. The score inched along before Dhruv was introduced, two fours and another lbw, this time
of Hewitt, saw the match well balanced, Salix 30/3 off 11 overs.
After egg and salad sandwiches on Happy Shopper white sliced in the funereal
clubhouse, battle was rejoined and lo and behold Dhruv
bowled the adhesive Spillane in the 15th. over. But that was it for a while as Rayner
(whose first scoring shot was a sixer off Buck) and
Ellis moved quickly on. Sciberras bowled Ellis but Kulasingam worked the ball around well as Rayner began to find the boundary. Backward square-leg Dhruv Patel brilliantly ran out Kulasingam,
77/6. Only four runs were required when Lumsden was
smartly caught Sciberras at deep mid-on off the
returning skipper and Rayner punched the winning
boundary two overs later.
The performance was not without its good points, but oh for
a few more runs, the story of the season. Salix just deserved to win, but The
Gents’ fightback was at least worthy of the shirt.
The Gents then retired en masse to the Bridge Hotel, a fantastically seedy
roadhouse, to chew the fat on a statistically unprepossessing but occasionally
inspiring season.
Gents; Buck 0, Gilkes 15,
Wright 11, D Patel 2, Denton 0, Sciberras 11, *S
Patel 32, Toft 0, Hill 10, †Turpin 0, Butt 0
not out, Extras 11, 93 all
out (27.1 overs)
FoW; 0, 25, 28, 30, 35, 65, 66, 87, 91, 93
Bowling; Kulasingam 1-14, Jacobs 2-25, Ellis 1-33, Lumsden
4-12, Chaganti 3-1-3-2
Catches; Rayner
3, Lumsden 1
Salix (won toss); Spillane
11, Dyson 0, Henig 1, Hewitt 14, Rayner
33 not out, Ellis 7, Kulasingam 8, Lumsden 6, Chaganti 0 not out,
Fletcher and Spillane dnb,
Extras 14, 94 for 7 (26.5 overs)
FoW; 1, 2, 30, 36, 59, 77, 90
Bowling; S Patel 2-18, Hill 1-3, Buck 0-18, D Patel 2-15, Sciberras 1-6, Wright 0-14, Butt 0-9
Catches; Sciberras
1
Lost by 3 wickets
2005 West London fixtures
|
Date
|
Gentlemen of West London
|
|
West XI
|
|
|
Sun
17 April
|
-
|
-
|
Addington (1743)
|
Won by 3 wickets
|
|
Sun
24 April
|
St.
Anne’s Allstars (42-11)
|
Lost by 39 runs
|
-
|
-
|
|
Sun
1 May
|
Hale
|
Cancelled
(rain)
|
Dinder and Croscombe
|
Won by 2 runs
|
|
Sun
8 May
|
12
Angry Men
|
Lost by 53 runs
|
India Select
|
Won by 9 wickets
|
|
Sun
15 May
|
Pak
(PALs)
|
Won
by 1 run
|
Staefa
|
Won by 53 runs
|
|
Sun
22 May
|
Urban
|
Lost by 32 runs
|
NB
Weasels
|
Won by 3 wickets
|
|
Sun
29 May
|
West
XI (BAMC)
|
Lost by 105 runs
|
Gents (BAMC)
|
Won by 105 runs
|
|
Sun
5 June
|
London Saints
|
Lost
by 3 wickets
|
London Rams
|
Lost
by 4 wickets
|
|
Sat
11 June
|
NB
Weasels (PALs)
|
Won
by 7 wickets
|
Captain’s
Select XI
|
Won
by 5 wickets
|
|
Sun
12 June
|
-
|
-
|
Octopus
|
Lost by
5 runs
|
|
Sun
19 June
|
Pak
(PALs)
|
Lost
by 6 wickets
|
Walthamstow
Horizontals
|
Won
by 8 wickets
|
|
Sat
25 June
|
-
|
-
|
London Saints (LNC)
|
Won
by 79 runs
|
|
Sat
25 June
|
-
|
-
|
Walthamstow
Horiz’ls (LNC)
|
Won
by 7 wickets
|
|
Sun
26 June
|
Brondesbury
Casuals
|
Lost
by 3 wickets
|
-
|
-
|
|
Sat
2 July
|
-
|
-
|
Ditcheat
|
Won
by 112 runs
|
|
Sun
3 July
|
London Rams
|
Won
by 61 runs
|
Dinder and Croscombe
|
Won
by 112 runs
|
|
Sat
9 July
|
NB
Weasels (PALs)
|
Lost
by 7 wickets
|
-
|
-
|
|
Sun
10 July
|
-
|
-
|
Sunderland SC
|
Won
by 195 runs
|
|
Sun
17 July
|
West
XI (BAMC)
|
Won
by 11 runs
|
Gents
(BAMC)
|
Lost
by 11 runs
|
|
Sun
24 July
|
12
Angry Men
|
Cancelled
(rain)
|
London Business School
|
Cancelled
(rain)
|
|
Sat
30 July
|
Sunderland SC
|
Won
by 91 runs
|
-
|
-
|
|
Sun
31 July
|
-
|
-
|
London Saints
|
Won
by 2 runs
|
|
Sun
7 Aug
|
Enterprise
|
Won
by 51 runs
|
St.
Anne’s Allstars
|
Won
by 10 wickets
|
|
Sun
14 Aug
|
London Saints
|
Lost
by 41 runs
|
Acme
|
Won
by 19 runs
|
|
Sat
20 Aug
|
-
|
-
|
North
Star
|
Won
by 30 runs
|
|
Sun
21 Aug
|
Jay
Bharat
|
Lost
by 6 wickets
|
Captain’s
Select XI
|
Lost by
5 wickets
|
|
Sun
28 Aug
|
St.
Anne’s Allstars (42-11)
|
Cancelled
|
-
|
-
|
|
Sat
3 Sept
|
-
|
-
|
London Business School
|
Lost by
7 wickets
|
|
Sun
4 Sept
|
London Owls
|
Won
by 57 runs
|
-
|
-
|
|
Sun
11 Sept
|
West
XI (BAMC)
|
Lost
by 8 wickets
|
Gents
(BAMC)
|
Won
by 8 wickets
|
|
Sun
18 Sept
|
Salix
|
Lost
by 3 wickets
|
-
|
-
|
|
Record
Runs
Wickets
Catches
Stumpings
HS
for
HS
against
LS
for
LS
against
|
Played
19 Won 7 Lost 12
Husain 586, S Patel 303, Denton 207, Sciberras
164 Sciberras 18, Husain/S
Patel 15, Buck 10, Butt 9
Buck/H
Patel 7, Denton/Turpin 5, Norcott/D Patel 4
Denton 3
264/6 v. London
Rams
203
all out by London Rams
60
all out v. West XI
92
all out by Sunderland SC
|
Played
23 Won 18 Lost 5
Vyas 735, Wright 430, Bapu
325, Taylor 302, Bhatt 224
Laing 31, Hill 22, Dane 20, Bhatt/Wright 17,
Taylor 16
Vyas 14, Dane 10, Bhatt/Wright 8, Laing/Robinson
7
Barling 2, Robinson 2, Bapu 1, Blackmore 1
264/6
v. Sunderland SC
201/6
by St. Anne’s Allstars
83/8
v. Dinder and Croscombe
60
all out by Gentlemen of West London
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M.
|
Inn.
|
NO
|
Runs
|
Ave.
|
Ct./St.
|
O
|
Ms
|
Runs
|
Wck.
|
Ave.
|
|
N Bhatt
|
2
|
2
|
0
|
77
|
38.50
|
1
|
12
|
0
|
52
|
2
|
26.00
|
|
A Buck
|
17
|
15
|
0
|
150
|
10.00
|
7
|
64
|
1
|
338
|
10
|
33.80
|
|
A Burman
|
5
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
2.00
|
-
|
1.1
|
0
|
12
|
1
|
12.00
|
|
G Butt
|
9
|
8
|
3
|
4
|
0.80
|
2
|
37
|
2
|
194
|
9
|
21.56
|
|
P Denton
|
18
|
18
|
2
|
207
|
12.94
|
5/3
|
4
|
1
|
6
|
2
|
3.00
|
|
V Dev
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
N/A
|
-
|
12.5
|
1
|
51
|
1
|
51.00
|
|
W Flack
|
2
|
2
|
0
|
4
|
2.00
|
1
|
12
|
0
|
49
|
1
|
49.00
|
|
R Gilkes
|
15
|
15
|
1
|
126
|
9.00
|
3
|
6
|
0
|
48
|
4
|
12.00
|
|
P Hill
|
4
|
3
|
0
|
20
|
6.67
|
2
|
23
|
8
|
67
|
5
|
13.40
|
|
N Husain
|
13
|
13
|
1
|
586
|
48.83
|
2
|
67
|
5
|
260
|
15
|
17.33
|
|
J Lewis
|
5
|
5
|
0
|
8
|
1.60
|
2
|
0.3
|
0
|
4
|
0
|
N/A
|
|
J Norcott
|
13
|
13
|
2
|
63
|
5.73
|
4
|
1
|
0
|
4
|
0
|
N/A
|
|
D Patel
|
11
|
11
|
0
|
136
|
12.36
|
4
|
56
|
1
|
258
|
8
|
32.25
|
|
H Patel
|
14
|
13
|
2
|
71
|
6.45
|
7
|
26
|
3
|
174
|
8
|
21.75
|
|
K Patel
|
5
|
4
|
1
|
6
|
2.00
|
2
|
24
|
1
|
111
|
6
|
18.50
|
|
S Patel
|
15
|
15
|
2
|
303
|
23.31
|
2
|
83
|
7
|
294
|
15
|
19.60
|
|
M Sciberras
|
13
|
12
|
0
|
164
|
13.67
|
3
|
64
|
4
|
268
|
18
|
14.89
|
|
S Snelling
|
2
|
2
|
0
|
9
|
4.50
|
1
|
14
|
2
|
42
|
6
|
7.00
|
|
K Toft
|
13
|
11
|
4
|
64
|
9.14
|
3
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
N/A
|
|
P Turpin
|
7
|
6
|
3
|
13
|
4.33
|
5
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
N/A
|
|
B Vyas
|
2
|
2
|
0
|
45
|
22.50
|
-
|
7
|
4
|
4
|
2
|
2.00
|
|
K Wain
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
1.00
|
1
|
6
|
1
|
38
|
0
|
N/A
|
|
J Wright
|
9
|
9
|
0
|
152
|
16.89
|
1
|
39
|
2
|
148
|
6
|
24.67
|
Also
played (1 game):
A Harris 1/10/10, 4-1-23-2, C Wright 1/1/0/25, 8-1-27-3, C Naish
1/2/0/1, D Wilson 1/1/0/7, J Robson 1/1/0/16, N Patel 1/1/0/0, 3-0-9-1 (1 ct.),
P Patel 1/-/-/-, R Bailey 1/1/0/26, S Mathias 1/1/0/1, 2-0-7-2, T Haddow-Allen 1/1/0/15, 7-2-14-2 (1 ct.), W Thompson
1/1/0/25, 7-3-16-0
Autumn quiz on the vintage ’81
harvest
The Gent has been quiet on the regaining of the
Ashes, for several reasons. There is little a magazine like this can add to the
superb cricket played by both sides. Furthermore, one is uneasy about the triumphalism of the celebrations among cricket parvenus,
who probably do not realise that the urn will be up for grabs again in 2006/7.
Defeat then will see all these Johnny Come Lately’s
putting their England
cricket tops back into the drawer on top of the rugby World Cup shirts which
were hidden away after last year’s Six Nations. Then we can have our game back.
Lest anyone think this disquiet is a particularly barmy example of Gent
eccentricity, it is shared by ICC star Mr. D. Laing
of West XI who confided that he was very annoyed at being unable to purchase an
item of cricket clothing recently due to by sudden demand stripping the
shelves. It all started going downhill when Dylan went electric.
We do, however, have a quiz question for you, inspired by
Mr. Buck. Name the 1981 England Ashes players who captained England
in a Test match. You will need quite a large piece of paper.
Websites which tell it like it
is
No.1 www.cheshamunited.com
Due to
miserable bastards (and me not being bothered anymore)
cheshamunited.com
has been closed.
Er, been talking to one or two people, mate
Excellent to hear from Mr. Ashton, the first call in a
while, though one capable of worrying interpretation. The opening sentence was
“Here mate, Marty (*) got married. Sorry I haven’t let you know before but I’ve
had lodsa people to tell as obviously I was the only
one invited.” One then underwent a spot of turmoil. Had he actually married his
old mucker? If so, how would this square with the
great Ashtonian boast that he has “never done anyone
older than 25”?
However, it became clear that his meaning was ‘Of our old
crowd of cronies the groom and his bethrothed
naturally saw fit only to invite me, as I am a more fit and proper person than
you, and I am now letting you in on the news.’ We therefore congratulate Marty
and his new wife, “a Sri Lankan bird who was actually bloody nice” being the
nearest Mark got to a name. Marty will be high on the list when it comes to
selecting the teams for the club’s 20th. anniversary
weekend in 2008, as of course will MWH Ashton.
(*) Ian “Marty” Renvoize,
a popular if unconventional Gents player from 1989 to 1995: 38 games, 172 runs
at 7.2, 1 wicket, 5 catches. Finest Gents’ Moment turning up to game
with paint-flecked cricket “greys” tucked in to old plastic shopping bag.
Greetings from tour hosts – 2006 ahoy!
Good
news. The wonderful Mr. Brian Susman, Captain of
Bedouins CC, has confirmed that his side will host The Gents in 2006 (see
below). We’ll keep late August free and work around the dates in the spring.
Salix have also renewed, on the equivalent Sunday to 2005, 17 September. Let’s
try to bring some kit along next time. Strongroom CC have also asked for a fixture. Though they could not raise a
side in 2003, they seem more organised now and play Saturdays at the beautiful
Highgate Woods ground. Could be a goer, check them out on www.strongroomcc.com and be prepared to
discuss at the A.G.M.
Greetings
from a wet and windy West Midlands! I am sure that we can work something in to the
2006 fixture list, so as we can get together with your “lot” again. It will
probably have to be fairly late in the season but, as soon as I have some
Sunday dates to offer, I will get back in touch. Unfortunately that is unlikely
to be until February-ish, because I have to wait for
David Thomas to contact me to let me know when the Enville
ground is available. Have a good winter, and try to keep in the best possible
physical shape with the 2006 season in mind!